Validator Economics

This guide covers the economic model for Monolythium validators.

Revenue Overview

Validators earn from:

Source	Description
Block rewards	Share of inflation based on stake
Fee rewards	Share of 10% fee distribution
Commission	Percentage of delegator rewards

Block Rewards

Inflation Phases

Phase	Rate	Annual (at 780M supply)
Phase 0	0%	0 LYTH
Phase 1	0.9%	~7M LYTH
Phase 2	8%	~62M LYTH

Rewards are distributed proportionally by stake.

Inverse Rank Distribution

Monolythium uses inverse rank rewards:

• Higher-staked validators receive slightly less per-stake
• Lower-staked validators receive slightly more per-stake
• Encourages stake decentralization

Fee Rewards

Transaction fees are split:

• 90% burned
• 10% distributed to stakers

Fee rewards depend on network transaction volume.

Commission

How Commission Works

Delegator Reward = Block Reward × Stake Share × (1 - Commission)
Validator Take = Block Reward × Delegator Stakes × Commission

Commission Parameters

Parameter	Meaning
Rate	Current commission (e.g., 10%)
Max Rate	Ceiling (cannot exceed)
Max Change Rate	Maximum daily change

Example: 10% rate, 20% max, 1% max change means:

• Currently taking 10% of delegator rewards
• Can increase up to 20% maximum
• Can only change 1% per day

Revenue Calculation

Example: Mid-Sized Validator

Assumptions:

• Total staked: 390M LYTH
• Validator stake: 2M LYTH (0.5% of total)
• Commission: 10%
• Phase 2 inflation (8%)

Annual block rewards to network: ~62M LYTH

Validator's stake share: 0.5%
Gross rewards: 62M × 0.5% = 310,000 LYTH

Self-delegation rewards (1M at 0.5% of stake):
  = 155,000 LYTH

Commission on delegator rewards (1M delegated):
  Delegator rewards = 155,000 LYTH
  Commission = 155,000 × 10% = 15,500 LYTH

Total validator revenue: 155,000 + 15,500 = 170,500 LYTH

This is simplified - inverse rank adjustments apply.

Cost Analysis

Fixed Costs

Cost	One-Time
Burn deposit	100,000 LYTH
Initial setup	Variable

Variable Costs

Cost	Monthly Estimate
Server hosting	$200-1000
Bandwidth	Included
Monitoring	$0-100
Time (ops)	Your rate

Break-Even Analysis

At $1/LYTH (hypothetical):

Monthly costs: ~$500
Monthly revenue needed: 500 LYTH

At 8% inflation with 10% commission:
Need sufficient stake to generate 500 LYTH/month

Actual break-even depends on:

• LYTH price
• Your stake and delegations
• Commission rate
• Operational costs

Commission Strategy

Low Commission (0-5%)

Pros:

• Attracts delegators
• Higher voting power growth

Cons:

• Lower revenue per delegator
• May be unsustainable

Medium Commission (5-10%)

Pros:

• Balance of attraction and revenue
• Common market rate

Cons:

• Competition from lower rates

High Commission (15%+)

Pros:

• Higher revenue per delegator
• Sustainable operations

Cons:

• Less attractive to delegators
• May lose stake over time

Recommendations

1. Set sustainable rates
2. Don't race to zero
3. Communicate value provided
4. Monitor competitor rates

Profit Maximization

Increase Stake

More stake = more rewards:

• Attract delegators (marketing, reputation)
• Increase self-delegation
• Provide excellent service

Optimize Costs

• Choose cost-effective infrastructure
• Automate operations
• Use efficient monitoring

Maintain Uptime

Every missed block = lost rewards:

• Invest in reliability
• Use redundant systems
• Quick incident response

Risk Factors

Slashing

Event	Impact
Downtime (0.01%)	Minimal
Double-sign (5%)	Significant

Factor slashing risk into revenue projections.

Competition

• Active set limited to 53
• Must maintain competitive position
• Stake can move to other validators

Token Price

Revenue in LYTH terms is predictable, but fiat value depends on market.

Tax Considerations

!!! warning "Consult a Tax Professional" Validator income may have tax implications:

• Block rewards as income
• Commission as business revenue
• Capital gains on token appreciation

FAQ

Is validating profitable?

Depends on stake, costs, and token price. Many validators are profitable; some are not.

Should I lower commission to attract delegation?

Balance sustainability with competitiveness. Unsustainably low rates harm the network.

What's a good target stake?

Enough to stay in top 53 with margin. This varies over time.

Related

• Registration - Become a validator
• Staking Rewards - Delegator perspective
• Tokenomics - Network economics